When you take the test, you will be presented with one Argument topic from this pool. Each Argument topic consists of a passage that presents an argument followed by specific task instructions that tell you how to analyze the argument. The wording of some topics in the test might vary slightly from what is presented here.
Ethnic Nationalism and Civic Nationalism The discrimination between civic nationalism and ethnic nationalism is common in writings on nationalism and nations, whether it be as the civic-ethnic division, the political-cultural, or the Western-Eastern division.
Writers, both modernists and ethnicists working within the paradigm of modernity, such as Hans Kohn, Liah Greenfeld, John Plamenatz, John Hutchinson, Ernest Gellner and Anthony Smith have all included this distinction in their writings.
The historical differences in the development of the nation-state between the West and the East in Europe have enforced these theoretical-cum-practical divisions. In fact the East-West divide is less a geographic divide than an historic one.
I am not disputing this historic divide, but my argument is that this divide does not justify the theoretical schism in writings on nationalism, nor does this divide extend to perpetuating the notion of two types of nationalism in practice. The argument behind this discrimination poses that though the end result for both sides was the modern nation-state the routes they took differed, which would terminally ordain the manner in which these nation-states expressed themselves as a unit of modernity.
That is, the formation of a nation would determine the national expression of a community. Therefore the basis of the nationalism is determined by whether the national feeling among the population emerged before or after the development of a nation-state.
And since every nation-state is inherently nationalistic 5 the timing of this development will in turn determine the motivations of continuity of the nation-state, thus its nationalism. This chapter will initially present the principles of civic nationalism and ethnic nationalism separately and then provide suggestions of how the interplay of the principles of each is necessary to certify the success of the practice of nationalism.
I shall conclude by examining culture high culture and popular culture as the common ground forming the foundation for both the categories.
The first thing we need to do is briefly examine the relationship between civic and ethnic nationalism and the connection to cultural homogeneity. The proposal by those whom I will term the dichotomists those who divide nationalism into two types is that both civic nationalism and ethnic nationalism pursue mutually exclusive forms of cultural homogeneity.
In communities where these tools are unsuccessful or unavailable the elite draw elements from the people developing a populist movement driven by the seduction of myths and symbols deliberately forming a shared memory and shared destiny with which to unite the people.
The minimal appearance of high culture is compensated with an over-zealous popular culture. They manufacture a social glue from the Volk in the absence of other instruments.
Cultural standardisation is then achieved through the ethnie and so the theoretical aim of ethnic nationalism is ethnic homogeneity. Culture "introduces a mode of transmission of traits or activities from generation to generation which is no longer dependent on being inscribed into the genetic constitution of the members of the group.
The removal of this dependency indicates the cultural break that modernity heralded and which modernists argue is crucial to the understanding of the functioning of nationalism. Ethnicity is perceived as linked to this genetic constitution of culture, or at least the perennial component of it.
This explains why as a consequence of this cultural break modernists such as Gellner rule out the necessity and relevance of ethnicity in determining nationalism. The problems is that ethnicity is not just an example of a continuum in culture from premodern times.
It is both a part of culture and a part of politics within modernity. Gellner removes it from the core of nationalism, whilst still acknowledging that it may influence the nature of nationalism. Gellner tells us that "[n]ationalism is a political principle which maintains that similarity of culture is the basic social bond.
The proposal by some more extreme ethnicists 9 is that ethnicity possesses its own form of nationalism absent of any civic elements. This would mean a nationalism that is unsuccessful and unfulfilled.
By contrast, it is the argument of this thesis that nationalism is a political and cultural phenomenon, and embedded in this is the influences of ethnicity. The ethnic rationale is as much a component of nationalism as the civic.
Both demonstrate methods by which culture is unifying. One particular practical example is the Basque lands of Spain whose nationalism may be categorised as ethnic nationalism, but also possesses representations of civic nationalism.This essay will discuss the relationship between Consumer culture and Identity.
The essay is divided into five parts; the first section is an introduction into what Consumer show more content This definition by Taylor is used in marketing literatures and provides a . Essay on Relationship Between Consumption and Identity - Relationship Between Consumption and Identity In traditional societies, people's identity was rooted in a set of social roles and values, which provided orientation and religious sanctions to define ones place in the world.
Consumer Behaviour Essay Consumption. Uploaded by. Alexia Henry. Social distinction and social identity Consumption is a marker of belonging and social differentiation (class, gender, generations and cultures) and therefore social distinctions between social groups.
Consumption can show the habitus, norms incorporated by . An open community of sustainable consumption & production scholars, academics and researchers. We offer you a vibrant community and a monthly newsletter. Here are some recent highlights. THE EFFECTS OF CONSUMPTION AND IDENTITY.
We are what we consume: goes the concept. Ever since humans have discovered that life around them revolved and constituted of numerous facets and things, their lives . On the uses of a liberal education: 1. as lite entertainment for bored college students.
September 1, Harper's Magazine.
Mark Edmundson. A college student getting a liberal arts education ponders filling out a questionnaire that includes an opportunity for him to evaluate his instructor.