Origin and usage in the context of xenophobia Etymology statute of the Antisemitic League The origin of "antisemitic" terminologies is found in the responses of Moritz Steinschneider to the views of Ernest Renan. As Alex Bein writes:
The Catholics made purely theological arguments as to why Jesus Christ had to have existed "in the flesh" None of these points are meant to stand on their own, but collectively they provide a very strong argument against the story of Jesus Christ being based on a real person. It is important to note that we have one, and only one, source of information about the life of Jesus and that is the Christian Gospels.
The Gospels are the sole source of information about this figure; everything that we "know" about "him" depends on these sources. There are two basic views of the Biblical Jesus as a real person today, the religious Christian view and the secular historical view.
The religious Christian view takes the Gospels as accurate and reliable accounts of the life of Jesus, including all of the miracles. The religious Christian view demands that Jesus Christ was a popular and well known figure in the region, who drew crowds of thousands of people and performed great miracles, who was such a revolutionary figure that the Jewish priesthood was compelled to have him arrested and put to death in dramatic fashion before hundreds or thousands of witnesses.
The secular historical view basically starts with the Gospels and then removes the fantastic or "supernatural" claims in the Gospels and accepts what is left as history.
The secular historical view tends to minimize the role of Jesus in the region, stating instead that he was barely noticed by others. Secular historians who believe that Jesus existed rely on the Gospels as essentially historical, but inflated, accounts of his life.
But are the Gospels reliable historical accounts? The Gospel of Mark is the first story of Jesus that was written, and all others are dependent on it The origin of the Gospels has always been unknown. At no point has anyone that we know of really known who wrote any of the Gospels, when they were written, or even where they were written.
Each of the Gospels could have been written anywhere from Egypt to Rome, and the estimated dates for their writing range from around 50 CE at the earliest estimates to about CE at the latest, with a minority of people proposing dates into the 4th century.
The traditional explanation for the origin of the Gospels has been that they were each written independently by people who were either disciples of Jesus or who received their information from disciples of Jesus.
This is called the apostolistic tradition, and according to the apostolistic tradition a Gospel could only be considered "authentic" if it had a direct lineage to an apostle, thus the names assigned to each of the Gospels were given in order to help establish their authenticity.
It has not always been believed, however, that each of the Gospels is an eyewitness account. Indeed, the Gospel of Luke explicitly states that it is compiled from the research of the author.
The earliest account for the origin of some of the Gospels comes to us from the early church leader Papias, from about CE: Wherefore Mark has not erred in any thing, by writing some things as lie has recorded them; for lie was carefully attentive to one thing, not to pass by any thing that he heard, or to state any thing falsely in these accounts.
Matthew composed his history in the Hebrew dialect, and every one translated it as he was able. He then goes on to state that the Gospel called Matthew was written by someone named Matthew who wrote his Gospel in "the Hebrew dialect", which would have been Aramaic.
We'll go ahead and look at one more early explanation for the origin of the Gospels and then analyze these statements. Around CE the early church leader Irenaeus expounded upon the information of Papias when he gave an account of the origin of each of the four Gospels that later became canon.Palestine Facts is dedicated to providing comprehensive and accurate information regarding the historical, military, and political background to the on-going struggle between the State of Israel and the Palestinian Arabs.
What are the causes of the Arab-Israeli Conflict?
(I'm beginning to understand. Those sneaky Jews made up bulls**t theories, and the truth is . THE PENTAGON HAD INVITED BILLY GRAHAM’S SON, the Reverend Franklin Graham, to deliver the opening sermon for their National Day of Prayer service on May 6, The worship service, held as part of the chaplain’s regular program of multi-denominational religious events, was a joint effort.
According to Benny Morris, among the first recorded violent incidents between Arabs and the newly immigrated Jews in Palestine was the accidental shooting death of an Arab man in Safed, during a wedding in December , by a Jewish guard of the newly formed Rosh Pinna.
The Origin of the Palestine-Israel Conflict. By Jews for Justice in the Middle East Published in Berkeley, CA, Jews for Justice has made this excellent resource available to people around the world. A Broader Look at the Long-Lasting Conflicts Between Arabs and Jews and the Status of the Refugees Essays: Over , A Broader Look at the Long-Lasting Conflicts.